The image of Afghans is deteriorating in the ISAF outlook but here I am not to write about that rather vice versa which as well follows parallel trend. If the west wants a change in Afghanistan then they should make a change by taking the Pity out of the system.
I had to squeeze further toward Hakimi to fit one or two more people in the room. It is a small room, with cushions carefully laid all around the room, about to witness stories of soviet war veterans. I am sitting in front of the door at the top of the room. No one else was prepared to take the place at the top reserving for each other as a sign of respect. Today is the engagement of a mate held in Microryan, a Soviet built apartment complex; perceived as one of the major constructions Afghanistan has ever undertaken. Ironically, the room is packed with people of Panjshir a tribe -now a province - which ferociously fought the soviets. During the ten years of soviet occupation; Red Army launched seven major offensives involving up to three regiments, mechanised, infantry and Airborne, backed by squadrons of gunships and jet bombers but they never pierced through the valley. Panjshiris are today a close ally of Americans in their fight against the Taliban, originating from the Pashton south.
Everyone except me and a couple of my mates are soviet war veterans of older age. It is snowing outside today and quite cold, my breath stands in front of me as white cloud, but that changed as the veterans warmed up the room with their passionate stories. Mullah Abdullah is 50 something years old and has spent a few years in soviet prison where he learned to speak Russian and got to know the soviets better. He was later appointed as an advisor to a prominent Massood commander for the knowledge of soviets he possessed. He spoke of tortures and atrocities in the prison but he also acknowledged the humanity of some officers; a general sense of respect for his old tough enemies. Panjshiris are famous for speaking a loud now that they were excited I could hear them echoing in the room. Listening to the stories I found a quality of respect for the soviet soldiers and officers. It is not unusual for soldiers to come to respect their fierce foes. Winston Churchill admired Sinn Fein Guerrillas and Boer commandos during his struggle with them in 1899-1900 and later but despised the pacifist Indian revolutionaries. Obviously, respect and appreciation of soviets could not be contributed to one factor. Afghans have a deep sense of Nostalgia. Their identities seem to be bolted in the past as the future remains too uncertain to be planned or even thought of. Whatever the underlying reasons for respecting soviets over western NATO would be; it for sure is a point for Nato to ponder about. ‘The other day Americans came to my village. While climbing my garden fence, a very short one, a soldier asked another chubby one to hold his hand. I went to tell him, soviets had a base on the top of the sheer cliff behind you and everyday they were climbing without holding hands. You better pray we all don’t turn against you or you’ll see hell on earth.’ Said Mullah Abdullah. A pleasant soldier who hands out a pack of biscuits, then takes a picture of it with a group of children to hang on his refrigerator only reinforces pitifullness. He, in the eyes of Mullah Abdullah, does not deserve respect.
When I was telling a civilian member of NATO that Taliban has spent most of their life acquiring what they consider knowledge, was not believable for her. ‘Their views and treatment of women are atrocious. How could they have any knowledge?’ was her response. Taliban are seen as stupid oppressors in general at ISAF with extremely irrational views. It seems now that the biggest mistake ISAF mandated Nato has made is undermining Taliban. They were thought of as a barbarian gang incapable of any reorganisation. It was yesterday I read an article in a western newspaper about Mullah Omar, the leader of Taliban, and his close associates fleeing from cave to cave. Taliban might be irrational or inarticulate but that doesn’t make them stupid. If Taliban were stupid why can’t the Nato prevail; it doesn’t take much to play the stupid. Afghans, in general, are seen as backward and poor while Nato soldier in his fully isolated camp continue to live a life of home, some unaware which country they are serving in. The soldier is nice as his nature commands to be, to the people he pities. This attitude goes back all the way to Nato’s system, policy and any future strategy. The aid system they have devised is pitiful. Until the west abandons this mindset of inferioriting and pitying Afghans the insurgency seem to persist; taliban won’t be understood; an unknown enemy is hard to beat. Western soldiers patrolling urban streets or country orchards lack any sense of connection with ordinary Afghans; they don’t need to understand Afghans, as Estonians or any other eastern Europeans are not understood by British or Germans, they need to be respected and taken on equal terms.
I am finding it hard to connect with my old Kabul mates as they have gradually become pessimistic and anti-western. ‘why do they feed us with propaganda about human rights and equal values while they perceive Afghan women as chattels of pleasure for the criminal warlord’ said Rahmat after learning Americans had distributed Viagra sexual stimulus pill among some village elders as a bribe. Rahmat’s frustration is rooted in the discrepancy he sees between NATO message and historical as well as current conduct of politics. The strategic need to intervene in Afghanistan has been deceitfully communicated to the policies implemented. The general perception of the intervening western armies is to assist Afghans as oppose to stabilise the government, root out the Taliban and terrorism … increasing Afghan pessimism and distrust has created contempt in the western circles. Contempt combined with pitying is not a good combination. ‘We do you a favour by being here therefore you should stay obedient’ need to be kicked out of the current Afghan episode.
3 comments:
Great Article.
It is a shame that US and Allied forces have just destroyed Afghanistan. In place of bringing what they promised they have just bought misery.
The institutions of justice, human rights exists only for USA .. for others they make it exist only on paper.
I really hope that some miracle happens, and Afghanistan gets rid of US and Taliban equally.
No more with Afghanistan the first picture is the beyond description beauty but just misery and bloodshed.
Afghanistan has been an unfortunate country that hasn’t found a good wisher neither from its citizens nor from the Intl community.
US invaded Afghanistan only after it was itself hurt. Afghans died for ten continous yrs in the hands of their fellow mujahideen and US turned a deaf ear to it and so did the international community.
Now at least, afghans do have a freedom to express themselves. and soon hopefully they can get more independence in the coming time.
Nobody who sets foot in Afghanistan can escape luring after the precious territory. A foothold in Afghanistan is a great help if you are looking after piping natural gas from Central Asia.
NATO are not in Afghanistan just to capture Mr.Bin Laden, though getting that sucker to justice could be one of the objectives. The real objectives are more interesting. USA is playing the very old game of building an empire, specifically the great game of winning central Asia from all type of opponents.
So, respecting Afghans is definitely not high on the list.
About Churchill and his quotes on respecting one's enemy, you should be too simplistic to take a quote at its face-value. The builders of the empire employ a vast armor of tactics. And pounding the enemy with fire power is not the only weapon one can use.
A more interesting weapon is to weaken your real opponent by encouraging a false opponent. It sometimes helps to have pacifist freedom fighters, and the British have encouraged the Indian national congress for this very reason, at its initial stages. But it sometimes helps to have the situation turn more violent, so that direct use of military force can be justified to the world. Pakistan has been playing the game to this tune in Afghanistan, and Israel has been playing the game to the same tune in Palastine.
The strength of a nation's leadership lies in seeing through these tactics, and adopting the right form of defence : either pacifist or armed. India was fortunate to have such a leader in 1947. The same thing cannot be said of Afghanistan or Palastine today.
Post a Comment